Dedman explores the mysterious life of Huguette Clark, heir of the W. Clark copper mining fortune. This is one of those books I bought to see what all the fuss was about. Were the reviews right?
There are a number of things that I don't care for in literature, and one of them is the family drama which centers on the drama as drama for its own sake, rather than to say something more about the world.
Part of my bias against this kind of writing comes from having cut my eyeteeth on science fiction, the literature of ideas which, at its best, is about today as much When this book was chosen by our book club for this month's theme of "tragedy," I approached reading it with some trepidation.
Part of my bias against this kind of writing comes from having cut my eyeteeth on science fiction, the literature of ideas which, at its best, is about today as much as it is about a future.
I also spent three years in a creative writing program where, god bless them, my fellow students seemed to spend a lot of time writing autobiographical stories that didn't have much to say beyond it sucks to grow up in fill-in-the-blank. The book had won a Pulitzer, and if there's anything I learned in my MFA classes on literature, an award was often a signal that a book was not for the reader but written for the critics.
A Thousand Acres screamed to me from its cover that it was that kind of book, that focused on the dissolution of the family as seen through a retelling of the King Lear story.
But, really, I shouldn't have. Having previously read two books by Jane Smiley the quite amusing MOO and the intelligent and thoughtful Thirteen Ways of Looking at the NovelI should have given her the benefit of the doubt.
Within the first fifty pages, I was surprised that Smiley had drawn me into her story, and while it was still fairly mundane the family dog wasn't going to start talking on pageto my dismayI found the voice of the narrator intriguing and wondered just how much of King Lear Smiley was going to be able to transpose to s Iowa.
Turns out, quite a bit, in a wondrously deft way that I would have termed a 'tour de force' if I used that phrase anymore.
The narrator is the eldest of the three daughters, and instead of a king dividing up his kingdom, the family farm is to be divided among the daughters somewhat early by forming a corporation in which he gives control of the farm to the children, in a sudden move that delights the older daughters and their husbands and alarms the youngest, who no longer lives on the farm nor has much to do with it.
Her concern about the alacrity of his decision infuriates the father, so much that he cuts her out of the paperwork process and thus the land itself.
Pretty much every plot point in the Shakespearean play is touched upon in some manner, but never so roughly that the connections feel strained.
If anything, Smiley's version is much, much more subtle in its understanding of the characters' motivations, giving both a sympathetic portrait of the older two sisters that is entirely missing in the play, as well as making the Lear figure less of a madman and more of a stubborn one, such that when his stubbornness leads him into the rain, his madness becomes if not sensible, at least reasonable.
You don't necessarily take any one character's side in this fight, but none seems such a villain. What Smiley does that, I think, one-ups Shakespeare even more than making the female characters sympathetic is that she truly makes the tragedy about the land as about the people. In the background, and infusing everything the characters do to a point, is the thousand acres of the title.
Perhaps it is because it is hard for us to imagine a kingdom as something one can own and pass to your children, for it's very easy to grasp the concept of these thousand acres, how much they mean to the family, and how tragic it is that this family cannot hold on to that land.
In the past, I've been less than sympathetic to the concept of the family farm, but even my cold heart can't read what Smiley has described here and see it as anything but a tragedy. What this novel has over the modern literature that I feared it would be is not only a plot people die here, not to mention being maimed and insulted and cruelly treated but a larger meaning, and that big picture of this being more than just a personal tragedy, is what makes this worthwhile reading.
Out of the group who read this for book club, I turned out to rate this book the highest, and that is to say, I recommend it strongly.From a very early age my face was either in a book, or my head was in the clouds Read More» and Ginny in Jane Smileys A Thousand Acres.
Bride, Ruth Patchett in Fay Weldon's The Life and Loves of a She-Devil, Sula in Toni Morrison's Sula, and Ginny in Jane Smiley's A Thousand Acres. Written in , Jane Smiley’s Pulitzer-winning A Thousand Acres pretends to be about the death of the American farm but, if I’ve ever read a book richer in subtext, I cannot recall it.
She tells the story via the lives of three daughters of a third generation farming family in Iowa in the ’s/5. A THOUSAND ACRES. by Jane Smiley. BUY NOW FROM Review Posted Online: May 20th, Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15th, Each week, our editors select the one author and one book they believe to be most worthy of your attention and highlight them in our Pro Connect email alert.
"Every book offers its own dilemmas and you just have to solve them. a short story collection, nonfiction, and young adult fiction. Her novel A Thousand Acres () received the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in In the process of writing “a novel of your own,” and, in review-like short essays at the back of the book, on.
I was at university when I first read A Thousand Acres. I was studying English and ensconced in King Lear but this book brought it to life for me in a new and vital way. Nov 28, · An Overview Of Jane Smiley's a Thousand Acres Essa stately patriarch could unknowingly produce such selfish schemers as Regan and Goneril, and Smiley's novel gives us the back story.
In this novel, set in Iowa farm.